Religion and ethics are two separate issues:
- a person can be extremely religious, yet still be quite unethical. Sadly, there are all too many of that sort about.
- conversely, a non-religious person can still have a strong code of ethics. As a litmus test as to whether a certain practice is right or wrong, you only need think for a moment what the world would be (i) without it, and (ii) if everyone did it. You certainly don't need some self appointed spiritual leader to tell you what is right and wrong.
The danger with allowing a religion to become the collective conscience is that what normally would be viewed as an atrocity can suddenly become a god-dictated duty:
- eg. Burning children in fires, exterminating the Canaanites, burning heretics at the stake, witholding essential medical treatment (such as blood transfusions or organ transplants) etc.
As to the WTS claim that "spirituality is essential", all I know is that I have got by quite well without it for these last 17 years.
Bill.